Former Municipal President Seeks Legal Protection Amid Embezzlement Claims

Roxana Lili, the former municipal president of Solidaridad and current member of the National Regeneration Movement, is seeking legal protection amid allegations of embezzlement during her term in office. There are claims that she mismanaged public funds while serving in City Hall.

The technical details of contract DPM/LP/ADQ/021/2022 were recently made public through institutional transparency systems. This contract, related to the purchase of electrical materials, was awarded to Miguel Ángel Garrido Rivera. The contract was set to a maximum of $16,164,708.03 and a minimum of $276,080.00, and was valid from September 14 to December 31, 2022.

However, attempts to access the details of this contract, and others from the same year, have been unsuccessful as the links appear to be disabled. This issue seems to only affect contracts from 2022, as the links for 2023 contracts are functioning correctly. This has raised serious concerns about potential attempts to hide information.

The inability to access these documents is a clear violation of the right to information access. It also brings into question Lili's management of public resources during her term. The question remains: what is being hidden?

Roxana Lili, now a member of the National Regeneration Movement's parliamentary group, has been accused of a lack of transparency in her contracts. These contracts, if made public, could potentially provide evidence of her alleged embezzlement during her term in City Hall.

Despite her attempts to keep this information hidden, the National Transparency Platform (PNT) has revealed the technical details of contract DPM/LP/ADQ/021/2022. This contract, related to the purchase of electrical materials, was awarded to Miguel Ángel Garrido Rivera. The contract was set to a maximum of $16,164,708.03 and a minimum of $276,080.00, and was valid from September 14 to December 31, 2022.

Attempts to access the details of this contract, and others from the same year, have been unsuccessful as the links appear to be disabled. This issue seems to only affect contracts from 2022, as the links for 2023 contracts are functioning correctly. This raises serious concerns about potential attempts to hide information.

The lack of transparency in the publication of these contracts is a clear violation of the right to information access. It also brings into question Lili's management of public resources during her term. The question remains: what is being hidden?