Firms Pursue Battery Storage Plant in Playa del Carmen Despite Semarnat Rejection

An aerial view shows a large cleared dirt area surrounded by dense green forest, with an orange outline to the left and a blue outline along the lower right edge, and a highway running along the upper right.

Playa del Carmen, Quintana Roo — Two energy companies are pressing ahead with plans for an industrial battery storage plant south of Playa del Carmen, even though federal environmental officials rejected an earlier permit for the site after finding jungle had been cleared without authorization.

Atlantica and Quartux Almacenamiento de Energía want to build SAE Kantenah, a facility that would store electricity and feed it back into the grid when demand rises. The project sits on the San Francisco property in Kantenah, a community within the Riviera Maya tourist corridor.

Semarnat rejected earlier application

The project’s history dates to September 2026, when it emerged that the Environment and Natural Resources Department (Semarnat) had denied the environmental authorizations requested for SAE Kantenah. During a technical site visit, inspectors found vegetation had been removed before the corresponding permits were issued.

The rejection covered both the environmental impact authorization and the forest land-use change permit, which are required before construction can begin. The original application was filed on Feb. 26, 2026, under case number 23QR2026TD019.

Despite that record, the project’s environmental paperwork still proposes building the storage infrastructure on the same property. It has yet to be confirmed whether the documents represent a new administrative filing after the rejection or an update to the earlier case file.

What the plant would do

The facility would be a utility-scale battery energy storage system, known in the industry as BESS. Unlike a conventional power plant, it would not generate electricity; it would hold power and release it to the grid to shave peak demand.

The executive summary of the environmental impact statement lists 20 megawatts of power and 60 megawatt-hours of storage capacity. The filing’s project description, however, cites 72 megawatt-hours. The discrepancy has yet to be explained.

The installation would include industrial battery containers, transformers, power conversion equipment and an underground transmission line. The documents allow three years for site preparation and construction and project a 50-year operating life.

Companies acknowledge damage to jungle

The environmental study says the project would occupy two parcels totaling 16,520.754 square meters, roughly 1.65 hectares. The first, measuring 4,629.452 square meters, would hold an access road; the second, at 11,891.302 square meters, would house the electrical facilities.

Both areas contain secondary growth from medium sub-evergreen forest. The assessment identifies negative impacts during site preparation and construction, including habitat disturbance, loss of vegetation cover, soil changes, airborne particulate matter and altered landscapes.

Although the study’s authors consider none of the impacts significant, they acknowledge effects in the moderate category. Proposed mitigation measures include rescuing wildlife and plants, controls to limit pollution, and environmental management during construction. Those measures remain proposals subject to review by regulators.

Land-use questions remain

The property lies within Environmental Management Unit 12, known as the Calica-Akumal corridor, where land-use rules allow infrastructure and equipment under certain conditions. The developers argue the project fits the zoning, although the study concedes federal authorization is needed because forest vegetation would be affected.

The document also notes that no sustainable tourism development program has been published for the area, limiting how certain urban compatibility standards can be defined.

The earlier unauthorized clearing raises questions about the current condition of the land, restoration of the areas already disturbed and compliance with environmental requirements. It also remains unclear whether the newly announced storage capacity reflects a redesign of the previously rejected project.

Discover more from Riviera Maya News

Sign up to receive a summary of the best news in your inbox, every day.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

By Ana Reyes

Ana Reyes covers environmental policy, conservation initiatives, infrastructure projects, and political developments across the Yucatán Peninsula for Riviera Maya News & Events. She reports on issues from sargassum management and reef conservation to the Maya Train, coastal development, and state and federal policy affecting Quintana Roo and the broader peninsula.Ana has covered environmental and political news since 2023, tracking key developments in Mexico's environmental regulations, coral reef protection, coastal zone management, and the intersection of tourism development with conservation efforts. Her reporting spans from Cancun's hotel zone to the Sian Ka'an Biosphere Reserve and the culturally significant regions of the Yucatán interior.Ana is fluent in English and Spanish, and draws from a wide range of sources including government environmental agencies, conservation organizations, academic researchers, and local community leaders to provide balanced, well-sourced coverage. She is particularly focused on how environmental policy decisions affect the daily lives of residents and the long-term sustainability of the region.For story tips: ana@rivieramayanews.mx