Alicia Bárcena Opposes Cozumel’s Fourth Cruise Pier

Cancún, Mexico — The Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources (Semarnat), Alicia Bárcena, has voiced opposition to the controversial fourth cruise pier project in Cozumel, stating that the initiative “appears to create more problems than solutions” and that the ideal scenario would be “to build nothing” in the area.

The File Is Under Review

During an interview as part of a working visit to Quintana Roo, Bárcena confirmed that Semarnat is reviewing the project’s file after environmental permits were approved under circumstances that, she argued, did not adequately consider all ecological impacts.

“We at Semarnat believe it requires review because many aspects were not sufficiently addressed in the Environmental Impact Statement. The governor and her team have even conducted analyses in the area, including diving surveys… and it seems the fourth [pier] creates more problems than solutions,” she stated.

If Not Viable, It Will Not Be Considered

Bárcena was clear in stating that if investigations confirm the project is not viable, it will not proceed. She emphasized that the process is in the legal review stage and noted that the agency is obligated to respond to citizen complaints.

“Citizens are expressing themselves clearly, correctly, and respectfully. We will never oppose the people; we will always stand with what the public wants,” she stressed.

Growth, But Sustainable

While stopping short of declaring a definitive cancellation, Bárcena acknowledged an ongoing coral reef restoration project in the area led by a local group. She reiterated that growth is possible but only if it is sustainable and environmentally responsible.

The fourth cruise pier project has faced strong opposition from environmental groups, scientists, and citizens, who argue that construction could endanger marine ecosystems, particularly coral reefs. Semarnat has already received over 100,000 signatures from citizens opposing the project, and according to Bárcena, this public outcry has been pivotal in prompting the federal government to reassess the project’s scope and risks.