Sisal Land Scandal: Deforestation Continues Despite Profepa Ban

Sisal, Yucatán — The environmental devastation in Sisal persists despite a closure order issued over two months ago by the Federal Attorney for Environmental Protection (Profepa) in response to the deforestation of a large dune area. New violations, including land clearing through fires and the subdivision of plots, have been reported in the same zone, raising concerns among local residents.

Ongoing Violations in Protected Area

The affected area, accessible via Calle 21 at its intersections with Calles 42 and 44, has seen further illegal activity, including controlled burns to clear vegetation and the demarcation of land plots. Residents documented these actions and shared images with Por Esto!, expressing fears that the land will be sold for residential tower construction—similar to a nearby project on Calle 21 between 34 and 36.

On May 1, a public holiday when surveillance was likely reduced, surveyors and other individuals were seen marking boundaries, prompting residents to alert authorities and share evidence on social media.

Alleged Land Sale Scheme

Initially, those occupying the land claimed they had nowhere else to live, leading the state government to allocate an area for housing. However, evidence suggests the true intent is commercial gain. The 10-hectare site is reportedly being divided into 8-by-20-meter lots, with plans to sell them for up to one million pesos each, marketed for their “privileged beachfront location.”

Tensions flared on March 11 when residents clashed with police over alleged sales to foreigners and the destruction of coastal dunes. The National Guard temporarily blocked access to the Pueblo Mágico during the confrontation.

Profepa’s Stance

Profepa’s director, Mariana Boy, has monitored the situation and previously emphasized the legal consequences of violating the closure order (EXP No. PFPA/37.1.2/3S.4/0017-25 and Folio PFPA/YUC/011/IA-25). The posted notice warns that tampering with or removing the seal may result in federal penalties under Article 187 of the Federal Penal Code.

Local authorities have yet to announce further enforcement actions. Meanwhile, residents remain vigilant, documenting ongoing violations and urging federal intervention to halt the ecological damage.

The situation underscores the challenges of enforcing environmental protections in ecologically sensitive areas amid development pressures.